[Status: Not planned] Hide dependent tasks until initial tasks are complete

We frequently have tasks that have starts dependent on other tasks being completed. Right now the due date changes on all tasks in a chain if the first one is moved, but it still clutters up our dashboards with tasks that can't be completed yet. We'd love if we could hide these tasks until the initial task is complete. 

Upvote 109
👍 Spot On 💡 Innovative Approach 💪 Stellar Advice ✅ Solved 🪄 Remove Kudos
41 comments

Hi Lisa.

I did read your suggestion above and it's not really going to work for us.  We are a small office (less than 50 employees), I have set up to have those sub-tasks with a start date way later and have the status color changed to red.  I will manually have to monitor my subtasks and re-date and re color my manager's subtasks when it is ready for her to work on.  I colored it red so if it does pop-up, she will inquire why it is red and not start on the task.  I have also updated her dashboard to only show tasks for the current week where as I had it set up to show all active tasks (future tasks as well).  We have columns running from active, green, yellow, red and deferred. 

I think this will be a good fix until there is a better solution.  I couldn't imagine monitoring/managing these tasks if we were a large office.  I am currently motivated to monitor my "lock QBs" tasks as it directly affects me and my ability to do my work.

I really hope and pray that in the NEAR future this ability will be added.

0
👍 Spot On 💡 Innovative Approach 💪 Stellar Advice ✅ Solved 🪄 Remove Kudos

Thanks a lot for your detailed reply, Ama Nishi, that's really helpful!

We'll let you know if we have an update from the Product team on this 👍

Lisa Community Team at Wrike Wrike Product Manager Become a Wrike expert with Wrike Discover

Lisa Wrike Team member Become a Wrike expert with Wrike Discover

0
👍 Spot On 💡 Innovative Approach 💪 Stellar Advice ✅ Solved 🪄 Remove Kudos

I'm here for the fade out idea!!! I would love this so much, and I know my team would love it. One big bit of feedback that I get a lot is that sometimes they don't know when something is ready for them, so having that visual for them would be incredible. What is the status on this with the Product Team?

0
👍 Spot On 💡 Innovative Approach 💪 Stellar Advice ✅ Solved 🪄 Remove Kudos

Hi Brittany Stringer! Thank you for supporting this suggestion. 

The status here remains "Not Planned" at the moment, but I'm passing your feedback to the team 👍

Lisa Community Team at Wrike Wrike Product Manager Become a Wrike expert with Wrike Discover

Lisa Wrike Team member Become a Wrike expert with Wrike Discover

0
👍 Spot On 💡 Innovative Approach 💪 Stellar Advice ✅ Solved 🪄 Remove Kudos

Have to agree here with what was said above - that a Finish-Start dependency is able to be worked on and shows up in to-do's as ready for action even though the predecessor task is not yet finished should be considered a bug that needs to be squashed ASAP, not a feature!

Otherwise what is the point of this kind of dependency for the end user responsible for the task(s) except to have a pretty visual and some automatic date changing when dragging it around a Gantt Chart? Clutter = Inefficiency, isn't that the whole point of Wrike's new lightspeed interface?!

Honestly struggling to believe that requests to solve this issue, with literally HUNDREDS of cumulative upvotes across several basically identical threads (I  just read them all looking and hoping for a reply somewhere that this issue had been fixed), is apparently still not even on a roadmap after 5 YEARS of requests.

That's 5 YEARS of users being frustrated by a needlessly cluttered to-do. Much sad, Wrike ☹️

0
👍 Spot On 💡 Innovative Approach 💪 Stellar Advice ✅ Solved 🪄 Remove Kudos

I'm sorry to hear you're disappointed at the lack of this functionality in Wrike, Angela Kennewell. Although I don't have an update for this at the moment, please rest assured that all feedback is being reported to our Product team, and if we have any updates on this in the future, we will let you know. 

Lisa Community Team at Wrike Wrike Product Manager Become a Wrike expert with Wrike Discover

Lisa Wrike Team member Become a Wrike expert with Wrike Discover

0
👍 Spot On 💡 Innovative Approach 💪 Stellar Advice ✅ Solved 🪄 Remove Kudos

Was this ever completed? If so, where can I find information on how to accomplish this? Thanks!

0
👍 Spot On 💡 Innovative Approach 💪 Stellar Advice ✅ Solved 🪄 Remove Kudos
Avatar
Juan

Hi Aubrey Huizenga, thank you for letting us know you are also interested in this option. At the moment, there are no updates regarding this feature, but we will inform you in case there are any changes.
 
We understand this improvement is important for you and your team and we have passed your feedback to our Product Development Team. In case you have any additional questions, please let us know.
0
👍 Spot On 💡 Innovative Approach 💪 Stellar Advice ✅ Solved 🪄 Remove Kudos
Avatar
Juan

Hi Community, after further consulting this case with our Product Team, we are glad to inform you that currently there is a perfect workaround that could apply to the use cases you have been sharing.
 
It is possible to automatically update the successors' statuses when all their predecessors have been completed using an automation rule.
 
  
 
This means that you can set a non-active status for all the successors and in your views or dashboards apply a filter to display only active tasks.
 
  
 
With the automation rule in place, after the precessors would be completed, the successors could actually get an active status and therefore be displayed in the view/dashboard.
 
With this process, successors would remain "hidden" until their predecessors are completed - or changed to the status of your preference.
 
I hope this information helps! If you have any additional questions, please let us know!
1
👍 Spot On 💡 Innovative Approach 💪 Stellar Advice ✅ Solved 🪄 Remove Kudos

This is definitely better than nothing but, unfortunately, this workaround means that almost every single task we schedule would count toward our monthly action allowance. For context, we currently have 350 active tasks alone. Just to automate this, have parent task status update to In Progress if a subtask starts work, and have start/due date reminders would almost immediately eat up our half of the allowance assuming each only runs once. This doesn't really feel acceptable for what should be a pretty basic project management feature. Additionally, the rule is only acting in a "forward" fashion - meaning if for some reason something gets marked completed by accident, all subsequent statuses won't revert back on reverting the predecessor status without some sort of additional automation.      

2
👍 Spot On 💡 Innovative Approach 💪 Stellar Advice ✅ Solved 🪄 Remove Kudos

We appreciate your feedback Travis Balthes, thank you for sharing it! I'll now send it on to the responsible Product team at Wrike 👍

Lisa Community Team at Wrike Wrike Product Manager Become a Wrike expert with Wrike Discover

Lisa Wrike Team member Become a Wrike expert with Wrike Discover

0
👍 Spot On 💡 Innovative Approach 💪 Stellar Advice ✅ Solved 🪄 Remove Kudos

Folllowing List for Post: [Status: Not planned] Hide dependent tasks until initial tasks are complete
[this list is visible for admins and agents only]

Top

Upcoming Live Sessions

Didn’t find what you were looking for? Write new post