Charles Sanderson
Объем активности
59
Последнее действие
В сообществе с
Подписка
0
Читающих
0
Бейдж
Комментарии
Голоса по действиям Charles Sanderson
Сортировать по голосам
Kudos
| Label | User name | User email | User type | Date | Link |
|---|
Agreed. I still think my suggestion of simplifying the entire process to just have two fields that give a "rolling" time frame based on when the report's being viewed - this handles any and every s...
Because of the untold number of possible scenarios a company might need, I think it makes most sense to simply add an ability to set a "rolling" time range with day granularity. Then somebody with ...
Hi Anastacia, There are a couple tasks for in-house maintenance of projects: Task type - containing options such as: Umbrella task, Content creation, Design, QA, Resource provision, kickoff/plannin...
I might be wrong, but I suspect something like the image example I've attached below could solve everything people want, and even make the existing fields obsolete? Basically a plus/minus toggle t...
We're only 19 away from 60 votes, everyone! We need a few more to get this on the To-Do list!
Ah! Good question. If I were to be greedy, I'd say all options! But, I don't wanna get tooo greedy! :) A lot of our preferred use-cases would be required custom fields being completed in order to c...
Also agree on this idea. We have several tasks that sit in our reports as "Active", though we're actually waiting on the prior task to be completed. Our projects timelines are often rather fluid. A...
As the original poster of this one, I wanted to point out that the new project status change may be getting lost due to semantics. "Back burner" sounds like a negative. I totally agree with Jamie ...
That'll work! Thank you!
Just took a look... I don't have (or don't see) the option, "Advanced filters." Also... While Dashboard is useful, we've found the reports preferable. This would mean I have to go to two different...