Website link attachments useless?

I've finally gotten around to trying the attach website link feature and it seems utterly useless, as it won't allow me to attach links to pages on our staging server, only our public-facing production server. It returns the error "Website can't be accessed" when I use a private URL from our staging server. As a proofing tool, it doesn't help me to review pages that are already on the production server. 

Is anyone else having this problem? Is there anything that I can do force Wrike to let me enter the URL of my choice, even if it wrongly thinks there's no page there? 

0
4件のコメント
Spot On Innovative Approach Stellar Advice
Avatar
Hugh

Hi Glen Turpin,

It currently is not possible to access HTML links on private servers through Proofing. However, the Product team are working on adding this feature to Wrike. As soon as I have more information, I'll be sure to let you know.

0
コメントアクション Permalink
Spot On Innovative Approach Stellar Advice
Avatar

Thanks for the response, @.... What's vexing about that is that (a) proofing often (usually?) happens on private servers, so a proofing feature that doesn't support that seems like it misunderstands a common proofing workflow, and (b) you had to make an effort to check and disallow links on private servers.

0
コメントアクション Permalink
Spot On Innovative Approach Stellar Advice
Avatar
Hugh

Thank you for the additional feedback, Glen Turpin! No update here at the moment - I'll keep you posted.

0
コメントアクション Permalink
Spot On Innovative Approach Stellar Advice
Avatar

I totally agree here - our production sites aren't HTTPS and the website review tool only allows HTTPS :(

1
コメントアクション Permalink

Folllowing List for Post: Website link attachments useless?
[this list is visible for admins and agents only]

Didn’t find what you were looking for? Write new post